Clayton or Stallworth? That's a good receiver competition

OR 

I am slightly disturbed by how easily people assume that Donte Stallworth will surpass Mark Clayton on the wide receiver depth chart. I know there is a level of disappointment amongst the fans when it comes to Clayton but remember he has several advantages Stallworth cannot claim.

Stallworth did not play in the NFL last year let alone the Cam Cameron offense, two things Clayton can say he did. This means that Stallworth is responsible for reacclimating himself to the physicality and mental strain of the NFL game. He has not played in a game since the 2008 season when he posted a sub par 17 catches, 170 receiving yards and an average of 10 yards per reception last year (poor statistics considering his speed and production in previous years in the league). Most people forget he is learning a new offense this offseason. Despite his impressive level of intelligence, this feat is something that takes time and does not happen overnight.

Clayton may not have been the stud starter the Raven fans were hoping he would develop into when he was drafted in the first round of the 2005 draft however his level of production has shown us that he possesses considerable talent. Clayton may be a good slot receiver option, the wide receiver position some coaches believe he best fits.

Remember speed isn't everything. A slot receiver must be able to find the soft spots in zone coverage and create seperation from defenders whether that be a linebacker, safety or cornerback. Until Stallworth can prove he can still do these things consistently, Clayton is the Ravens best bet on the roster for a third receiver.